Lies have long legs cheating, peer scrutiny and loyalty in teams

نویسندگان

چکیده

Groups affect cheating in a variety of ways. While it is typically assumed that third party scrutiny decreases cheating, there scarce evidence as to whether members team cheat more or less if their individual actions are disclosed peers. To fill this gap, we run lab-in-the-field experiment with boy and girl scouts during summer camps. Scout troops organized into patrols: these naturally occurring persistent groups own common goods very different from the minimal used lab experiments. find low overall level our results show disclosure peers induces cheating. In follow-up experiment, able replicate finding within population students same age. Our somehow contrast other studies showing hierarchical but aligned ample social science fields on adverse effects peer interactions among adolescents. Finally, findings suggest effect independent rewards individual.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Lies in disguise – A theoretical analysis of cheating

We perform a (psychological) game-theoretic analysis of cheating in the setting proposed by Fischbacher and Föllmi-Heusi (2013). The key assumption, referred to as perceived cheating aversion, is that the decision maker derives disutility in proportion to the amount in which he is perceived to cheat. A particular equilibrium, characterized by three intuitive properties, captures the stylized fa...

متن کامل

Peer Ratings in Cooperative Learning Teams

A universal concern about cooperative learning is the possible existence of “hitchhikers,” team members who fail to fulfill their team responsibilities but get the same high grade as their more responsible teammates. A common way to minimize hitchhiking is to use peer ratings to assess individual performance of team members and to adjust the team project grade for individual team members based ...

متن کامل

Large Teams Have Developed Science and Technology; Small Teams Have Disrupted It

Teams dominate the production of high-impact science and technology. Analyzing teamwork from more than 50 million papers, patents, and software products, 1954-2014, we demonstrate across this period that larger teams developed recent, popular ideas, while small teams disrupted the system by drawing on older and less prevalent ideas. Attention to work from large teams came immediately, while adv...

متن کامل

a comparative study of the relationship between self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in productive skills

تمایل به ارزیابی جایگزین و تعویض آن با آزمون سنتی مداد و کاغذ در سالهای اخیر افزایش یافته است. اکثر زبان آموزان در کلاس های زبان از نمره نهایی که استاد تعیین میکند ناراضی اند. این تحقیق جهت بررسی ارزیابی در کلاس های زبان انگلیسی به هدف رضایتمندی زبان آموزان از نمره هایشان انجام گرفته است که در آن نمرات ارائه شده توسط سه گروه ارزیاب (ارزیابی خود دانشجو، همسالان واستاد) در مهارت های تولید (تکل...

15 صفحه اول

Good Guys vs. Bad Guys: Countering Cheating in Peer-to-Peer Authority Computations over Social Networks

Eigenvector computations are an important building block for computing authority, trust, and reputation scores in social networks and other graphs. In peer-to-peer networks or other forms of decentralized settings (such as multi-agent platforms), this kind of analysis needs to be performed in a distributed manner and requires bilateral data exchanges between peers. This gives rise to the proble...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of behavioral and experimental economics

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2214-8051', '2214-8043']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101732